IT departments wasting thousands on redundant tech
Nearly half of IT departments from Australia and New Zealand are wasting over $10,000 per year on redundant technology, according to Rackspace research.
A survey of IT decision-makers in the two markets shows that 25% of IT teams are wasting $10,000 to $49,999 per year on redundant IT. A further 13% are wasting $50,000 to $99,999 and 10% are wasting over $100,000.
The survey shows that 43% of IT decision-makers polled had experienced executive pressure to implement a technology even though they believed it was too risky for the business.
Nearly three-quarters (73%) of survey respondents admitted to making a poor purchasing decision, either because the software and hardware didn’t deliver what was promised or became irrelevant within the intended lifespan of the technology.
“In a crowded market where new technologies are released at such a rapid rate, the modern-day choice has become less black and white than it was a decade ago,” said Angus Dorney, director and general manager at Rackspace ANZ.
“It can be difficult to forecast if a purchase is going to deliver on its promise to provide your business with sufficient ROI. In some cases, this research shows that a lot of technology is purchased and never used.”
Besides the technology, more than half of businesses, including 77% of medium-sized organisations, have hired an IT employee that turned out to be a bad fit.
Outsourcing is one solution for companies adopting a technology that’s beyond their in-house expertise, but 57% of respondents have had a negative outsourcing experience from an IT service provider. Top complaints include badly managed services, repeated downtime and security concerns.
Who should take the lead in responsible AI?
The companies that treat responsible AI as a necessity today will be the ones defining the...
Why there's no efficient automation without integration
It's not enough for organisations to simply use AI: they must leverage it in a way that...
AI-driven observability: fundamental for business continuity?
The strategic blending of observability with AI is no longer a nice-to-have: it's necessary...